Coldbrain.

Restoring an iPhone after a failed iOS 4.0.1 update

I had lots of problems yesterday upgrading my iPhone to iOS 4.0.1. I’d heard stories of others having trouble, so I had put it off - but still came unstuck.

When installing the updates, the status bar froze about when it reached 10% of the way across. It sat like this for around 4 hours, so I decided that I wasn’t simply being impatient - something was wrong - and I should disconnect the phone and try again. 

Trying again isn’t so easy, though. I was stuck with a phone that wouldn’t turn on. Or off. It was in the purgatory of the white Apple logo on a black background. Not healthy.

I tried rebooting it - holding down the home button and power button - but this just put me back a couple of steps, with the phone asking me to reconnect to iTunes, attempting a restore, and getting stuck at the same stage of the process.

After a brief period of panicking, Googling, trialing and erroring, I found the solution. Here is how to recover your iPhone if you bork it during an iOS update:

  1. Disconnect your iPhone from your computer
  2. Quit iTunes
  3. Find and delete the .ipsw files. These files contain the iOS software updates. On a Mac, they are saved in: Username\Library\iTunes\iPhone Software Updates
  4. Restart your machine
  5. Reset your iPhone by holding down the power and home buttons for several seconds
  6. Start iTunes
  7. Plug your iPhone in
  8. Click ‘restore’ when prompted
  9. When this process finishes, turn on your iPhone, leaving it still connected. It will ask you if you wish to restore from a previous backup. You most certainly do
  10. Wait for it to re-sync with all your apps, music, movies etc

(As an aside, I’m amazed at how comprehensive the backup is. I had to re-download all my Instapaper articles, which is no problem at all, but most of the applications I have used since last night are all in their previously used states. Amazing.)


    Century Egg - A Pungent Delicacy | Oddity Central - Collecting Oddities
Century Eggs sound like the most disgusting things ever:

Known also as preserved egg, hundred-year egg, thousand-year egg or thousand-year-old egg, the Century Egg is a Chinese delicacy used in many traditional dishes. Fresh duck, chicken or quail eggs become Century Eggs after weeks, sometimes months of preservation in a mixture of clay, ash, lime, salt and rice. […] After the preservation is complete, the hull mixture and egg shell are removed to reveal the now dark-brown egg-white and a dark-green, creamy and pungent yolk. It’s the alkaline that raises the pH of the egg from 9 to 12 or more and gives it a strong smell of ammonia and sulfur.

(And I sort of want to try one.)

    Century Egg - A Pungent Delicacy | Oddity Central - Collecting Oddities

    Century Eggs sound like the most disgusting things ever:

    Known also as preserved egg, hundred-year egg, thousand-year egg or thousand-year-old egg, the Century Egg is a Chinese delicacy used in many traditional dishes. Fresh duck, chicken or quail eggs become Century Eggs after weeks, sometimes months of preservation in a mixture of clay, ash, lime, salt and rice. […] After the preservation is complete, the hull mixture and egg shell are removed to reveal the now dark-brown egg-white and a dark-green, creamy and pungent yolk. It’s the alkaline that raises the pH of the egg from 9 to 12 or more and gives it a strong smell of ammonia and sulfur.

    (And I sort of want to try one.)


    j mascis ~ ammaring (via silencioslt)

    I could watch J solo all day.


    Greenaid Brings Color to Urban Landscapes : Crafting a Green World

Greenaid takes old gumball machines, rehabs them and turns them into “seedbomb” dispensers. The seedbombs are made from clay, compost and seeds and are perfect for the cracks, crevices and empty spaces found in daily life.

    Greenaid Brings Color to Urban Landscapes : Crafting a Green World

    Greenaid takes old gumball machines, rehabs them and turns them into “seedbomb” dispensers. The seedbombs are made from clay, compost and seeds and are perfect for the cracks, crevices and empty spaces found in daily life.


    Super Mario Bros. (by Andreas Heikaus)

    This video was part of my Bachelor thesis at the University of Applied science and art Hannover. The Super Mario Bros. game, released on the Nintendo Entertainment System, is not longer bound to the television size and get interactive with a new environment. The emphasis of my thesis is on the matchmoving work. It is the process of matching CG elements into live-action footage. 

    I’m a sucker for most Mario-related videos, and have been known to waste a couple of hours watching speed runs on YouTube.

    This is something else altogether, though. Something very nice indeed.


    Candwich - The Sandwich in a Can! - Mark One Foods
Oh dear God, America, what fresh hell is this?

    Candwich - The Sandwich in a Can! - Mark One Foods

    Oh dear God, America, what fresh hell is this?


    Everywhere you look, there seem to be increasing signs that we are living inside a novel that JG Ballard started to write at the exact moment he died, a novel that takes the form of a reverberating hallucination that just keeps giving. Perhaps the novel/hallucination ends when Ballard himself is the most followed character on Facebook, his brain radiating astounding time-bending realities at the centre of the new post-internet universe where the numerous and multiplying levels of our existence interact.


    The Longest Night

    givemesomethingtoread:

    One Easter Sunday, the Alaska Ranger—a fishing boat out of Dutch Harbor—went down in the Bering Sea, 6,000 feet deep and thirty-two degrees cold. Forty-seven people were on board, and nearly half of them would spend hours floating alone in the darkness, in water so frigid it can kill a man in minutes. Forty-two of them would be rescued. Here’s how.

    I tend to save most of the GMSTR picks to read later, so this was hanging around my Instapaper for quite a while before I read it. I’m really glad I did. The story of the trawler going down and the subsequent heroic rescue is fascinating and exhilarating; it’s almost written as fiction, and it works really well.


    nostrich: Let's Talk About Football

    In the link above, Nostrich (aka Richard, curator of the marvellous Give Me Something To Read) writes about the use of technology in football. I’d encourage you to read his well-considered and well-written post. In summary, he argues that football simply isn’t fair: there is too much luck involved, no technology in place to conclusively prove that decisions are made correctly, and therefore is not a game of pure skill.

    One of my favourite things about football is that it is fundamentally the same game, whether contested by pub teams on a wet Sunday morning or by the largest nations in the world at an international tournament. Adding video replays or goal line technology for only those leagues and tournaments that have the required money and facilities to allow it removes this consistency and means that not all games will be subject to the same conditions. I would never see this as a positive step.

    Such breaks in play will be too disruptive for the game. Richard notes that other sports that use video technology have natural breaks in play - between points in tennis, balls in cricket, plays in American football, etcetera. Football doesn’t have these natural breaks for reflection and consultation. This is a difficult obstacle for proponents of technology in football to counter, and I’m yet to hear a convincing argument. 

    I happen to agree with Sepp Blatter (a phrase I thought I’d never utter) about interrupting the flow of the game. England ‘scored’ twice in as many minutes against Germany. For a period of a few minutes either side, the game was end-to-end, high-energy, instinctual. Basic and primal, not entirely keeping with how I think England should play the game, yes: but it was entertaining. Consult a video in the middle of it, and all the flow and urgency is gone. If FIFA decide to allow technology to determine, say, whether the ball crosses the goal line, that sets a precedent. How could you stop there? Why not review every decision? Every offside, every corner, every minor indiscretion? We’d need a whole new set of laws to govern the number of appeals each team has, adding a further level of complexity to game that is beautiful in its simplicity.

    There is also the sheer enjoyment of those seconds after a goal has been scored. Earlier today, on a Watford FC mailing list that I subscribe to, someone posted this in a thread on a similar discussion, which I fully endorse:

    Really, I do marvel at how easy it is to dismiss the seconds that - for me, in my serious minority - make football what it is. Those seconds are precious, forever memorable and, more than anything, unexpected; you don’t get to have them back after the video review has been completed. When Allan Smart’s goal hit the back of the net at Wembley, the next ten or fifteen seconds were among the most precious of my entire life; I know I’m not alone on that, if nothing else. Hit pause while an unseen official checks that he wasn’t offside and, even if that only takes five seconds, you’ve created a quite different dynamic; a wholly inferior dynamic, to my mind.

    That’s an extreme example, obviously. But it’s proving quite hard to establish a fairly basic premise: that “the right result” isn’t a goal to be pursued at any cost.

    Adding an official to review video evidence doesn’t narrow the margin of error - it simply adds another one. How many of these decisions are clear cut, even on the third or fourth replay from yet another alternative angle? The video evidence still has to be examined and interpreted by a human.

    Football is supposed to be fun to watch. Having a debatable decision go for or against you adds so much to the appeal of the game, and introduces an element of random uncertainty that is as fun as it is frustrating. Just the same as an injury to your team’s star striker as a result of an innocuous collision is frustrating, or a rain-sodden pitch stopping a goal-bound shot from creeping over the line.

    Admittedly, as Richard notes, a game with so few goals means that a poor decision can have a large effect on the game. But this is simply the game we all grew up with. A percentage of decisions have always been made incorrectly; it is just the increased media coverage that serves to highlight and magnify them. Whether we turn on the TV, attend a match or put our shin pads on and actually play, we all know that the referee has the final say, and is fallible. We all know this, and we should embrace it.

    Crikey. I’ve written more words about football this past week than in the rest of my life.


    Building a better England team

    The post-mortems of England’s World Cup disaster have begun. Typically, the main target so far has been Fabio Capello. There may be something in this - his adherence to 4-4-2 has been baffling - but the greater problem is replacing the ageing squad.

    Here’s a possible line-up to start the first game in Brazil in 2014. This is, of course, just wild speculation; a better bet might be to try and predict the English weather in four years time. But sometimes it is fun to wildly speculate.

    It must surely be time to entrust Joe Hart with the number 1 shirt. Whilst he is short of experience at top-level club competition, England now need to stop changing goalkeepers so regularly and settle down with a first choice. Hart has displayed all the characteristics required, and deserves his chance.

    For the past few years, England have possessed strength in depth at centre back. All currently in their late twenties or early thirties, most of the current crop will not expect to still be playing international football at the next World Cup. That said, one suspects that John Terry will still be in and around the squad in 4 years’ time. I’ve never been a huge fan, but at 33, Terry doesn’t even have pace to lose, and you suspect that his overall positioning will improve with yet more experience. 

    Michael Dawson will be 27 later this year and is still awaiting his first international cap. If he successfully retains his place in an improving (and Champions League-bound) Tottenham team, I would imagine that over the next few years he will become a first-choice for his country.

    The potential problem here is a lack of pace. If his career kickstarts again, presumably with a move away from Manchester City, perhaps Micah Richards could offer a more mobile option.

    Both England’s current first-choice full backs should still be around. Ashley Cole will be 33, and will be challenged at club and country by Kieran Gibbs, a very similar type of player. Glen Johnson will be at his peak, and will have hopefully developed his defensive responsibilities.

    Both full backs are very attacking, but I would suggest playing a 4-2-3-1 formation, with the deeper midfield duo providing cover should the full backs rampage up the touchlines.

    Jack Rodwell should feature as one of these two. He is equally capable of playing central defence or central midfield. England must hope that David Moyes seeks to make the most of all his talents by playing him in his most logical position, rather than forcing him to become a centre back purely on the basis of his physique. A gifted player, he could be both anchorman, breaking up opponents attacks, and deep-lying playmaker. Think Xavi Alonso - including the fierce long-range shooting.

    The other space is harder to fill. Perhaps Tom Huddlestone will improve enough, or maybe Scott Parker will step up and make an impact on the England team in what will be the tail-end of his career.

    It’s clear that England lack an advanced playmaker, or any sort of creative player that fits between the traditional banks of midfield and attack. This has been a long-standing problem, which I’ve mentioned before: our attacking midfielders in recent years have tended to be energetic and explosive box-to-box midfielders that simply prefer attacking to defending. There’s been no central attacking focus between midfield and attack, no-one to assist with ball retention and building attacks. The current crop will be way past their peak, so step forward Arsenal’s Jack Wilshere. He possesses all the skills required. This is an enormous weight for Wilshere to carry, and I wouldn’t want him to be burdened with the weight of England’s expectations in four years time, when he’ll still be just 22. But of all the options available, Wilshere looks to be the most promising.

    On the flanks there are roles for Theo Walcott and Adam Johnson, both overlooked for this tournament’s squad. Both are capable of playing as wingers, wide midfielders and more orthodox attackers, and can interchange freely. Aaron Lennon will provide adequate backup.

    I don’t think you can look any further than Wayne Rooney for the lone striking role. He has played this countless times for Manchester United, and if England can resist the temptation to aimlessly lump it forward, his interplay with the other attacking trio could cause teams problems.

    Should Wilshere not be ready, or if someone like Connor Wickham progress into an international-class number 9, then Rooney could play the trequartista/number 10 role. It’s another role he knows well, and he’s intelligent enough to play it for England.

    To manage this team? For me there’s only one choice: the special one

    Above all, the transition needs to begin soon. Let’s use the forthcoming European Championships to get the basics in place. Abandon the short-termism that has plagued our nation: begin to blood some of the younger players, adopt the new system (there is no aesthetic or pragmatic reason to continue with 4-4-2), and let’s try to do something different. Not for the sake of it, but because otherwise, it’s only going to get worse.



    Posts I Liked on Tumblr